Per the article, it wasn’t a pirated game though, it was used. That’s the issue here.
They can be ban happy with pirates if they want, but banning people from being able to just swap games in real life is fuckin dumb.
Per the article, it wasn’t a pirated game though, it was used. That’s the issue here.
They can be ban happy with pirates if they want, but banning people from being able to just swap games in real life is fuckin dumb.
Noerknhar@feddit.org 1 day ago
Well technically, it was both, at least from their perspective. And as soon as they were contacted, the situation was resolved.
I’m not saying I wouldn’t be pissed if this happened to me, and I’m not saying I like the whole “we block your internet access” thing. But what I’m saying is that this is normal practice for decades (!!!) now for all console manufacturers, and that the only reason why this is a “news article” now is because “Nintendo = bad” clicks so damn well.
fluckx@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Banning people who play games they bought second hand most definitely is not an industry practice for decades for all console manufacturers.
Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
I can’t think of a single console that normalized banning people for buying used games…except for switch 2. Wanna give some examples?