Comment on Perpetual motion eludes us again.
reliv3@lemmy.world 6 days agoNot AI. I’m in academia, so I write academically.
I specify “physics work” to mean physic’s definition of work (dot product between Force and Displacement).
And to not connect the importance between the electric and magnetic field as it pertains to the the electrostatic force and magnetic force reveals your basic under of the physics. Hence, why you prior comment was so problematic…
theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Oh academia! Of course you are! Kinda weird you didn’t specify your field and experience… Welp, must have had no space left for that in that reply of yours…
Kinda odd that an academic would continously write nonsense… Work in the contest of physics (what fucking other context would we use it when we are discussing physics…) is defined as: the energy transferred to or from an object by a force acting on it as it moves through a distance!Aka ‘W = F • s’, its not a dot product its multiplication dear doctor? Also makes absolutely no sense in the prev context you used it… If you just wanted to pick a word to insinuate a sort of insight, you should have used midi-chlorians! Sounds a lot cooler and makes just as much sense!
So far every single one of your statements had been wrong… I will have to ask you to stop sharing your brilliant insights to beget the spread of misinformation!
reliv3@lemmy.world 6 days ago
It’s very apparent that you are not a good faith discusser and your knowledge of physics is very low.
I’m checking out of this discussion
theUwUhugger@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Could you check out from every physics&whatever else you pretend to be discussion? Again, you didn’t even know the formula of work despite totally being an academic…
It genuinely upsets me that people like yours vote equal mine… Hope you know you looked really dumb and desperate the whole time!
reliv3@lemmy.world 5 days ago
it’s incredible how confidently wrong you are about something that you could have easily verified.