For som reason, “ywars” changed your voice into that of a pirate, and it made me cackle. Thanks 💛
Comment on Wikipedia Pauses AI-Generated Summaries After Editor Backlash
HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
Wikipedia would probably be the only organization that I would trust with AI. They’ve been using it for a while now to flag sections that might need to be rewritten, but they don’t let the AI write anything itself, only notify human editors that there might be a problem. Or, at least that was what I heard a couple of ywars ago when they talked about it last.
Quexotic@beehaw.org 3 days ago
HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
Lmao. Yeah, I don’t use auto-complete and rarely re-read things when I write, so mistakes are bound to happen :P
Quexotic@beehaw.org 3 days ago
Fair. I should really quit using autocomplete and stop using Gboard for privacy reasons. Honestly, I’m just a little bit away from de-googling and going graphene. Just gotta spin up immich and a few other servers.
sculd@beehaw.org 3 days ago
That is not the case here. These are not bots which flagged issues, but literally a LLM to help with writing “summaries”, which is why the reaction is so different.
HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 days ago
Yeah, I was thinking that if any organization would do AI summaries right, it would be Wikipedia. But I trust the editors the most.