Comment on Bruh, chill

• infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  So you’re making an arbitrary value judgment about which legal violations are acceptable and which aren’t. That’s fine to do, for yourself. But you’re applying them onto others.

  It would be one thing to debate someone about when it is and isn’t OK to break the law, but you’re not doing that. You’re just implying that someone else is wrong because they don’t share the exact same illegalist framework as you. And you’re resting your entire point upon that supposition.

  I dunno bud, if you’re OK with people speeding to pass, maybe relax about people doing the speed limit in the left lane instead of insisting that it’s your way or the highway. Pun intended.

  source

  • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Lol the jumps in logic you make should be nominated for an award. My original comment was one sentence long and the follow up kike three more, how do you know what “framework” I operate in lmao. The implications you make somehow about legality being a measure of contention and the crux of my argument is just wrong on its face.

    If you’re going slow in the left lane and blocking others, you’re affecting others negatively direcly for no benefit to yourself. If you could get over a lane, continue going the speed you desired but not be blocking others wanting to go your speed and don’t, you’re just a dick. We can move in ways that allow others to move in theirs without the “I’m first, its my way” mentality. The law has nothing to do with it.

    Not to mention I didn’t assume thats what was happening, and asked OP to confirm before I went on with my point. Something I suggest doing before assuming someone’s “framework”.

    source

    • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      Bruh, chill.

      source

      • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

        Lol, ok kiddo.

        source