Comment on "You can't just have Geralt for every single game" says his voice actor, and if you think The Witcher 4 making Ciri the protagonist is "woke," then "read the damn books"

theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Imo there are two types of “wokeness”.

  There is a diverse inclusive story by someone with an underrepresented experience who partially lived that story and has a unique perspective and ideas.

  And then there is a “diverse” story constructed by an all white male board of execitives who think “wokeness” is trendy.

  Movies like I Saw The TV Glow, Parasite, Sinners, etc are fantastic “woke” stories coming from the former group.

  The latter group comes up with stories like “Ghostbusters but all women” or “Oceans 11 but all women” which I think should rightly be criticized.

  source

  • theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    The problem with Ghostbusters (2016) didn’t have anything to do with having an all female cast, it was more about the timing of the jokes, the lack of slow quiet scenes to build atmosphere, and the effects being crappy unmemorable CGI

    source

    • WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      The problem with Ghostbusters (2016) didn’t have anything to do with having an all female cast

      That’s what I just said.

      If women arent the ones greenlighting these movie, directing them, or even writing the script, how could they possibly be the problem?

      I listed a bunch of actually good “woke” media. They were made by a trans and black creators but if you want examples of women being funny look at Veep, the Good Place, 30 Rock, Parks and Rec, etc.

      The problem as I pointed out is a predominately white male board member of business grads who feel having an all female cast is all they need to market a movie, so they can skip giving a shit about the product.

      it was more about the timing of the jokes, the lack of slow quiet scenes to build atmosphere, and the effects being crappy unmemorable CGI

      Because Sony can’t make a movie to save their lives. Look at Morbius, Kraven, Madame Web, etc.

      There was a time in the early 00s/10s where society said “any representation is good representation”.

      Movies like Black Panther and Get Out were inherently going to do well because they catered to an audience demand that had been long underrepresented.

      Nowadays there are actually good movies. We dont have to settle for bad representation. If you want a horror movie that’s an allegory for not transitioning you can watch it, if you want a vampire movie where the vampires are an allegory for racism and white exploitation that’s in theaters right now.

      Spotting background character 1 and 2’s gay kiss in Disney’s reboot of Buzz Lightyear feels a lot less exciting to me.

      When a bunch of white board members decide to make a movie “for women” and resurrect a dead IP and start forcing a script, that will be inherently more shallow than going to Amy Poehler and asking if she has an idea to pitch.

      This is why Marvel succeeded in giving Ryan Coogler a higher degree of creative control for Black Panther than Sony did for any of the female cast in Ghostbusters.

      While I’m enjoying diverse films like Sinners and I Saw the TV Glow, if you’re more interested in Disney’s live action remake of The Little Mermaid, or Disney’s live action remake of Snow White, go right ahead and watch it. I’m not saying you can’t.

      But the idea you have to “support it” is nothing but marketing. I don’t think you’re really supporting diverse stories, I think you’re supporting corporations who exploit diversity and intentionally rage bait the worst racists imaginable for free marketing instead of investing the areas that you point out would make the movie better.

      source

      • theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world ⁨22⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Suppose we agree then

        source