There’s assumptions involved in detecting satire from just text as well. You would just have a Reverse Poe’s law where “any extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for satire of those views without clear indicator of the author’s intent”.
Normally when people say things we (justifiably) assume that to be what they mean, which is why satire works much better in person because intonation can make the satire explicit without changing the words or saying it out loud.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
I feel like it should be more like “Poe’s sometimes true thing” because satire does indeed still exist.
ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 19 minutes ago
There’s assumptions involved in detecting satire from just text as well. You would just have a Reverse Poe’s law where “any extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for satire of those views without clear indicator of the author’s intent”.
Normally when people say things we (justifiably) assume that to be what they mean, which is why satire works much better in person because intonation can make the satire explicit without changing the words or saying it out loud.
TrickDacy@lemmy.world 15 minutes ago
I never said anyone should assume something is satire. It’s possible to just not know something and not make a judgement.