Comment

That’s meaningless pedantry that doesn’t contribute to the discussion or alter the message in any way, but go ahead and give yourself a pat on the back for showing everyone how very, very smart you are.

source

Sort:hotnew top

dragontamer@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
The board of directors removes the obvious corruption argument.

And shareholders select the board of directors anyway, so if shareholders agree to new terms of values then CEOs can and will be fired.

I’m looking at Intel for example and how they mistreated Pat Gelsinger and fired him despite being a technical leader. And the new incoming CEO is Lip-Bu Tan, who is a non-technical finance bro who is worse. Why did the shareholders (and board of directors) prefer Lip-Bu Tan?

source
- mmddmm@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago
  
  The board of directors removes the obvious corruption argument.
  
  Hum… Not exactly, but it does shift the burden.
  
  source