This article is just, “making a TV show is expensive and a lot of it goes to the place you made the movie” ?

Why is it being framed as some huge charity case/economy boost? It’s a TV show and they filmed it in one of the most expensive places available.

I suppose it could have all been sets and greenscreen and it would have been cheaper, and it was an intentional choice to spend more money in the city, but I didn’t the why mentioned in the article at all.