You’re still not paying them from a personal account so you’re not doing business. Business accounts are not tied to a person, they’re tied to the company so their example makes no sense. Also that’s not a correct interpretation of the law anyway, because obviously the law wouldn’t work like that because it would be fucking stupid.
TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
so your rationale for believing this person is wrong about a foreign country’s laws, with notoriously complex immigration law, is that “it would be stupid”
i just feel like i need to point out how stupid these replies are, because if we have no sense of the truth, believing you over the other guy is just as stupid.
stop arguing immigration law online, talk to a lawyer
echodot@feddit.uk 2 weeks ago
We don’t arguing immigration law we’re arguing about whether or not paying your employees via remote payment services constitutes working.
Obviously it doesn’t
hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 weeks ago
If it wasn’t me, the owner who did it, but it was someone on the payroll, like a manager. If they were on holidays, and had to do it as it’s their responsibility, is it now considered work?
Of course it’s work. It’s spending your time, doing a task for a business.