Comment

Comment on Is there any other way to interpret these comments (convo between a 20 year old and 14 year old)

Funny you mention legality. The person the OP is slandering (as in it’s not true enough to be considerable), was actually taken to court and acquitted in all instances, because the people trying to target her with slander fall apart under due process. She wasn’t depicting anything NSFW about minors, she just used wording that missed a beat.

TL;DR Yes, there are absolutely other ways to view this, especially when you did not question the defense. Gullible lemmings, I see why this place is Communist now.

source

Sort:hotnew top

ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
[deleted]
source
- ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  Three reasons for that.
  
  Slander under law does not require it to be a lie.
  
  It is a lie. The context is different in both instances. Anyone who sees the whole thread knows.
  
  The channel you link to is known for being transphobic and not caring as long as it calls out people it doesn’t like as pedos, because that’s what it is, a slander channel.
  
  I’ve been in tune to this for a while.
  
  source
  - ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    [deleted]
    source
    ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee ⁨6⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    
    How am I slandering by posting the screenshots
    
    I answered this question. You then edited it to include another one.
    
    The person above Triagonal asks for NSFW material. It’s straight up dark web material. Triagonal simply asks for a story about a day out.
    
    This is how the two of you sound right now.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments