Comment on Why The Government Has Infinite Money
unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 year agoYour arguments are not addressing any position that was actually presented to you.
Even someone who agreed with each point you made, and also agreed that you succeeded in rejecting some position actually expressed, would not be justified in also agreeing with your rejection of all nuance.
You are simply not suited to discuss geopolitics if you believe that questions are soluble by simple statements about what is “100% right” versus “100% wrong”.
No one is ever "100% right’, and your methods are not ones that will bring you close.
TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Then explain in which way is Russia right in attack in ukraine then. You calling me wrong without any reason why.
unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Again, you are not addressing any views actually expressed.
It is beginning to seem your pattern is that when someone fails to affirm a position identical to yours, you impose your own invented view of the other’s position.
When you understand why such a pattern is counterproductive, then you will be beginning to deepen your engagement in nuance.
TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Your position is that the conflict in ukraine is nuanced. I argue that it isn’t. I gave my arguments why it isn’t you failed to give yours.
Only thing you have done is to say I’m not adressing any position presented, which is a lie.
It is beginning to seem that you have no arguments and are here simply to waste my time
unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 year ago
You asked me why I believe the invasion is good.
Quote the text in which I expressed a view that the invasion is good.