can only say that EVERY successful society has a central government.
you don’t define success.
Comment on What do you think of anarchism?
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 days agoAs I stated, people defending anarchy doesn’t understand the psychology of larger groups.
I can only say that EVERY successful society has a central government. If Anarchy could work as well, how come there are no successful anarchy societies.
Not as in so few, but NONE! If it should work so well, why has no country ever even tried?
When a country is thrown into anarchy because the government is removed, and nothing replaces it. It always turns out the same. Extreme violence, theft and hunger.
That’s what is shown to happen when Anarchy reigns.
nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 days ago
I absolutely do, as in NOT being dominated by Extreme violence, theft and hunger.
nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
you’re describing capitalism
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 days ago
So how do you imagine Anarchy could work without capitalism. Even communist countries have a capitalist element.
nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
there are
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Bullshit.
nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
exarcheia, the Paris commune, and the swamp maroons come right to mind, as well as anabaptists
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 days ago
This is what I get when I search “Exarcheia paris”
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exarcheia
I have no idea what you are trying to argue here, but as far as I can tell Exarcheia is neither self governing or has anarchy and it isn’t in Paris, but in Greece???
You are extremely sloppy at trying to arguing your point.