There’s a whole bunch of different steganographic methods. You wouldn’t necessarily have to apply them to audio signals, you could apply them to the text itself. It’s certainly trickier, so you would want to keep the plain text very short so your ciphertext doesn’t get too long or weird
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Sounds more like you’re using codewords and phrases at that point? Or do you mean something different?
evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I’m not clever enough to come up with a good example on the spot, but you could have something along the lines of a scheme where the word selection corresponds to a not-obvious code. For example, if you wanted to secretly send the word “hello”, and you’ve previously given your receiver a code word “apple”:
Hello > 7 4 11 11 14 Apple > 0 15 15 11 4
Adding the code word to the secret message, you’d get:
7 19 0 22 18 > H T A W S
Then your message could be something like:
There are definitely way better methods to do the encoding part, and probably also better ways of doing the concealment part.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Yeah. At that point I think it’s no longer considered steganography. It’s really interesting though all the stuff they did during the cold war to get past surveillance.