Comment on USians - Uh, *we've all seen this* right?
Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 1 week agoSpoonamores document was largely debunked. If you check the numbers against official numbers, he is wildly off
Comment on USians - Uh, *we've all seen this* right?
Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 1 week agoSpoonamores document was largely debunked. If you check the numbers against official numbers, he is wildly off
Glasgow@lemmy.ml 1 week ago
Check again now their analysis and methodology has been released
smartelections.substack.com/p/so-clean
Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Still is conjecture.
They are pointing to statistics and saying “see! Fraud” that’s not really evidence. Stats can be manipulated to show a lot of things.
Discussing Durham only:
Kamala was unpopular and very divisive for democrats, especially around the Palestinian genocide.
Many people probably didn’t choose her vs the attorney general.
Glasgow@lemmy.ml 6 days ago
That isn’t what evidence means. It absolutely is evidence.
The data is open, so is the analysis. If you read the bottom more is on the way and that will be reproduced by others in time.
If you’d look at it properly you’d see there are many things that wouldn’t occur by chance regardless of how unpopular she was.