Comment on If you save, we will charge you more
Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 day agoAssuming they have the same type of connection, yeah, why wouldn’t they?
Comment on If you save, we will charge you more
Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 day agoAssuming they have the same type of connection, yeah, why wouldn’t they?
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 22 hours ago
Simplified scenario.
The cost for the grid provider to maintain a transformer is $1000.
A transformer can serve 20 low-use households, or 2 high-use households.
Both the low-use and the high-use households have the same, 200A service to their homes. The only difference is in how much they actually use.
A neighborhood has 20 low-use households (1 transformer).
That same neighborhood as 10 high-use households (5 transformers).
This neighborhood of 30 houses has $6000 in maintenance costs.
Here are the two options we are talking about:
Fixed rate. Each household in this neighborhood pays a fixed, $200 “connection fee” to cover these costs.
Consumption-based. Each of the 20 low-use household pays $50 ($1000 total, for the 1 transformer they share) and each high-use household pays $500 ($5000 total, for the 5 transformers they share).
Fixed fees only make sense for covering administrative costs, which scale per user. Grid maintenance costs scale based (primarily) on total consumption. Fixing maintenance fees forces low-use households to subsidize high-use households.
I feel like I’m in the fucking twilight zone here. The community does not seem to comprehend what they are demanding.