Comment on Please create a non-secure password.
frezik@midwest.social 2 days agoMy personal system has guaranteed no vulnerabilities
If you think that’s true, then you don’t have the experience to make a secure system.
Comment on Please create a non-secure password.
frezik@midwest.social 2 days agoMy personal system has guaranteed no vulnerabilities
If you think that’s true, then you don’t have the experience to make a secure system.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 days ago
What? What kind of system do you think I have? The only vulnerability is if they can hack my brain.
frezik@midwest.social 2 days ago
Yeah, that’s going to be a terrible system. The human brain isn’t capable of keeping track of enough entropy to create a secure password system.
More generally, it’s a big red flag when anybody thinks they can make a better system than publicly available and verified systems. You’re not capable of that, I’m not capable of that, Bruce Schneier is not capable of that. No matter how smart you are, you missed something. That’s why I didn’t need to know a single detail.
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 day ago
What an idiotic argument, the level of entropy comes from the rules first and foremost, putting a 1 and an A together is the exact same entropy as using 2 and B.
You completely fail to understand the argument. I’m not arguing my passwords are stronger, I’m arguing they are SAFER! because they are not stored on 3 different systems, one of which could theoretically have a vulnerability.
frezik@midwest.social 1 day ago
Oh dear, no. You cannot match a cryptographic (P)RNG for generating passwords. Not even close.